Original evidence first
Listen to the recording or read the document before the explanation.
A documented chronology
The story, in order. The evidence, beside it.
Justice for Joey follows the recordings, documents and sworn words from the first DCP&P voicemail forward—one dated chapter at a time.
“Don’t take my word for it. Read it. Watch it. Decide for yourself.”
How this site works
Facts, allegations and opinions stay separate.
Dates anchor the story
Every chapter identifies when the event happened and what supports it.
You make the judgment
Contested claims are labeled. Contradictory records are placed side by side.
The chronology
Start where the record starts.
This first edition establishes the spine of the story. Supporting records will be added carefully, with private information redacted.
The voicemail
Terrance Campbell of the New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency leaves Joey a 42-second message about “a referral that we received involving you.” He says he can provide “a little bit of insight without divulging too much.”
Original voicemail recording
YouTube backupJoey calls the police before the meeting
Twenty-three minutes after the voicemail, the Ocean Township report records that Joey called police and requested a “keep the peace” escort before meeting with DYFS. Its narrative says Campbell told patrol he had concluded the alleged complaint did not occur, that it was no longer a criminal investigation, and that he wanted to speak with Joey about what was needed to conclude his case.
Public copy: Joey’s home address, telephone number and unrelated personal descriptors have been redacted. The original report is preserved.
Ocean Township Police Department incident report
Read the police reportDownload Olland document requestsThe meeting officers recorded
Joey does not avoid the investigator. The police report states that officers recorded a lobby conversation with Joey and then recorded Joey’s conversation with Campbell on body-worn camera.
Transcript highlights
What Campbell says on the recording
These are exact quotations from the transcript. Read the complete exchange below and decide for yourself.
“She never observed you touch anyone.”
Terrance Campbell — page 4, lines 3–6“She said, oh, her mommy stated it.”
Terrance Campbell — page 4, lines 7–10“She did make a false allegation.”
Terrance Campbell — page 5, lines 1–2Public copy: the minor child’s name and Joey’s date of birth are redacted. The cover identifies the interview as March 2, 2022 at 12:40 p.m.; the certification page refers to November 3, 2022. That date conflict appears in the supplied transcript and has not been altered.
Fast-forward · August 10, 2026
Four years later, the source is still unnamed.
In the 2022 interview, Campbell repeated the vulgar Sweet Sixteen allegation to Joey in front of Officer Bleichner. In that recorded exchange, Campbell did not identify who supposedly heard Joey make the statement or explain how he verified it.
Did Olland tell Campbell?
“No.”
Olland denied telling Campbell that Joey made the Sweet Sixteen statement.
What facts support the claim?
“Another person quoted Plaintiff to Defendant in a separate conversation.”
The answer does not identify that person or give the date, place, words used, or method of communication.
Did Olland hear it herself?
“Admitted.”
Her response states that she was not present and did not personally hear Joey make the statement.
What the certified responses leave unresolved
- Olland denies giving the allegation to Campbell.
- She admits she did not hear Joey say it.
- She does not identify the “another person” she says quoted Joey.
- She also admitted that neither daughter had reported to her that Joey touched them in a sexual or inappropriate manner before the school’s DCP&P referral.
Source: Jennifer Olland’s certified Answers to Interrogatories and Responses to Requests for Admission, dated August 10, 2026. The quotations above reproduce her answers; the criticism is Joey’s stated opinion.
Source documents
Download the discovery and read it yourself.
Each public copy preserves the filing while redacting children’s names, contact information, and handwritten signatures.
Requests for Admission
Joey’s 25 requests and Olland’s certified responses.
Interrogatories
Joey’s 25 written questions and Olland’s certified answers.
Requests for Production of Documents
Joey’s 25 document requests and Olland’s certified responses.
Recorded Waretown Police Department meeting
Watch on YouTubeThe complaint Mount Laurel would not take
One day after the recorded Campbell interview, Joey drove to the Mount Laurel Police Department and asked to report the false accusations. Officer Sean Prikey’s own report says Joey “wanted to file a report,” but Prikey directed him to Manahawkin. In 2026, Prikey denied declining the complaint in one response and then admitted in another that the decision to decline it was his own.
Public copies: Joey’s residential contact information, personal identifiers, physical descriptors, and handwritten signature have been permanently redacted. The substantive records are unchanged.
The record versus the response
Prikey’s own answers contradict each other.
The documents establish that Joey came to Mount Laurel seeking to make a report and was sent elsewhere. The dispute is what Prikey now calls that decision.
Why Joey was there
“Joseph Fabozzi … stated he wanted to file a report” concerning false accusations.
The report then says Joey was advised to respond to the Manahawkin Police Department.
Prikey denies declining it
“Denied. At the time, Plaintiff was advised that a Complaint should be filed with the Manahawkin Police Department.”
Then Prikey admits the decision was his
Prikey admitted that “your decision to decline Plaintiff’s request to file a citizen’s complaint … was your own decision.”
RFA 13Admitted
He had authority to accept or reject the complaint.
RFA 21Admitted
He did not investigate the school communications.
RFA 23–24Admitted
He contacted neither Campbell nor Ocean Township first.
RFA 25Admitted
He did not interview Jennifer Olland first.
Complete source set
Download every Prikey reference
Public copies preserve the words and remove private contact information, identifying details, and Joey’s handwritten signature.
Prikey’s March 3, 2022 police report
The two-page contemporaneous report stating that Joey came to Mount Laurel wanting to file a report about false accusations.
Download PDFJoey’s requests for admission
The 25 requests asking Prikey to address his report, his decision, and the investigative steps he did or did not take.
Download PDFPrikey’s admissions responses
Prikey’s August 2026 answers, including Responses 13, 14, and 21 through 25 discussed in this chapter.
Download PDFResponse cover letter
Counsel’s August 12, 2026 transmittal letter enclosing Prikey’s admissions responses.
Download PDFJoey’s interrogatories to Prikey
The 25 written questions seeking the facts, communications, policies, and investigation behind Prikey’s decision.
Download PDFJoey’s production requests to Prikey
The 25 requests for reports, recordings, communications, policies, and other records concerning the March 3 encounter.
Download PDFPrikey police report and certified discovery responses
Read Prikey’s police reportThe health consequences
Joey attributes the health crisis documented beginning March 4 to Jennifer Olland’s accusation and Officer Sean Prikey’s refusal to take his report the day before. The ER and hospital records document anxiety, agitation, obsessive and looping thoughts, distress while discussing the accusation and police, and a voluntary behavioral-health admission. The records document the timing and symptoms; they do not make a legal finding that Olland or Prikey caused them.
Public medical copies: dates and substantive clinical information are preserved. Birth date, medical-record and account numbers, private portal links, and internal identifiers are permanently removed. Six nonclinical fulfillment pages containing billing material and a driver’s-license image are not published.
What the medical record shows
A documented crisis—and a clean ER drug screen
Joey says the accusation and the refusal to take his report had a severe effect on his health. The records document what clinicians observed and treated beginning the next day. They support the timing and symptoms; they do not decide legal responsibility.
What clinicians documented
- Anxiety and obsessive or looping thoughts
- Agitation and distress when discussing the accusation and police
- No suicidal or homicidal ideation and no acute ingestion reported
- A voluntary admission for behavioral-health care
Every listed drug category was negative
Cannabinoids, cocaine, opiates, amphetamines, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, tricyclic antidepressants, and oxycodone were all reported negative. Blood alcohol was reported below 5 mg/dL.
This was ER testing for medical care, not a forensic or chain-of-custody test. It establishes the results on March 4, 2022; it does not by itself resolve every allegation about other dates.
Complete clinical source set
Download the public medical record
All clinical pages supplied for these four exhibits are included. The public copies are flattened so removed identifiers cannot be recovered from hidden PDF layers.
Exhibit 9 · Emergency-room laboratory results
The March 4 Southern Ocean Medical Center results, including the urine drug screen in which every listed category was negative.
Download PDFExhibit 10 · Emergency-room provider notes
All nine pages of the March 4 ER notes documenting anxiety, agitation, looping thoughts, and Joey’s discussion of the accusation and police.
Download PDFExhibit 11 · RWJ Barnabas clinical record
The complete 64-page clinical chart for March 6–14. Six nonclinical fulfillment pages—including a driver’s-license image—are intentionally excluded.
Download PDFExhibit 12 · Barnabas discharge summary
Both pages of the March 14 discharge summary, with medical-record, account, and internal document numbers removed.
Download PDFPrivacy and completeness: the four downloads preserve the medical evidence while removing birth date, medical-record and account numbers, portal-session links, and internal identifiers. The 64-page Exhibit 11 download contains every clinical page supplied. Six preceding record-fulfillment pages—including an invoice, audit material, and a copy of Joey’s driver’s license—are administrative rather than clinical and are intentionally excluded from publication.
ER laboratory results, provider notes, clinical chart, and discharge summary
Read the ER laboratory recordThe Facebook post becomes a police call
The Mount Laurel report records that Jennifer Olland called police after seeing Joey’s March 4 Facebook post. Officer Jacob Hein wrote that Olland said the post accused her of making false child-abuse allegations and that Joey had signed a citizen complaint against her. The report records the parties’ statements and police activity; it does not decide whether an allegation was true.
Public copies: residential and workplace addresses, dates of birth, telephone numbers, a handwritten signature, a child’s initials and age, and photographed faces have been permanently removed or obscured. The substantive records are otherwise preserved.
The March 17 record
Read what was reported—and what happened afterward.
These points come directly from incident report 2022-08254. A police report records statements and actions; it is not a judicial finding that every statement in it is true.
What Olland reportedly told police
“Ms. Olland reported she has also seen Mr. Fabozzi parked outside her residence approximately three times.”
What Olland later answered under oath
Q: “He’s never showed up at your house?”
A: “Not in Mt. Laurel.”
What the supplied report documents
- Olland called Mount Laurel police on March 17 after seeing Joey’s Facebook post about the DCP&P accusation and his citizen complaint.
- Officer Hein wrote that Olland alleged Joey had been outside her residence and had posted information about her and her daughter.
- The CAD record shows the call type changed from harassment to child abuse or neglect and then back to harassment.
- A May 11 supplemental report says Joey told Detective Amaro that Mount Laurel police had previously turned him away when he tried to report the allegedly false DCP&P accusation.
- The same supplemental report says Amaro instructed Joey to return to headquarters, complete a citizen complaint, and bring supporting evidence.
Source documents
Download the March 17 record set
Each website copy protects private identifying information while preserving the substance of the supplied record.
PDF
Full Mount Laurel case report
Six-page report for incident 2022-08254, including the March 17 narrative, May 11 supplemental narrative, and CAD logs.
Download PDFPDF
Ocean County citizen complaint
The March 2 complaint Joey signed alleging that a false report had been made against him.
Download PDFPDF
Facebook post supplied with the report
The March 4 post preserved in the police file. The photo collage is blurred to protect every person shown.
Download PDFPDF
Discovery folder index
One-page discovery index listing the documents and four video files associated with incident 2022-08254.
Download PDFMP4
Body-camera and trial-testimony comparison
The supplied comparison video with every child’s face blurred. The original audio and the rest of the edit are unchanged.
Download MP4The discovery-folder index identifies four related MP4 files. This chapter currently includes the comparison video Joey supplied. Additional source recordings can be added separately after the same privacy review.
Police report, citizen complaint, Facebook exhibit, and discovery index
Read the full case reportThe written determination
DCP&P sends Joey its written determination after the investigation. The letter states that the allegation was Unfounded. A later municipal-court transcript records Prosecutor Matthew Weng arguing that Joey could have posted that finding.
Public copy: the children’s names, Joey’s home address, and agency case identifiers have been permanently redacted. The original document is preserved.
The record, side by side
The written finding and Weng’s courtroom argument
The agency’s determination
“The Division conducted its required investigation and determined that the allegation was Unfounded.”
The letter also states that the investigation result would not be kept on the central registry of confirmed perpetrators of substantiated incidents.
September 13, 2023 · State’s closing argument
What Prosecutor Weng told the court
“Mr. Fabozzi has a piece of paper that says these allegations are unfounded … He could have posted that and nothing else and said they investigated me, and it was unfounded.”
Transcript page 86, lines 11–18. This was Weng’s argument to the court, not a separate ruling by the judge.
Read the source record
Download every reference cited here
These public copies preserve the substantive text while removing residential contact information, personal email addresses, and Joey’s handwritten signature.
Full harassment trial transcript
The complete September 13, 2023 municipal-court transcript, including Weng’s page 86 argument and the court’s not-guilty finding.
Download PDFWeng’s responses to admissions
Matthew Weng’s July 7, 2026 responses, including his response to Admission No. 5 quoting the courtroom statement.
Download PDFDeficiency notice to Weng
Joey’s notice explaining why the admissions responses were deficient and requesting amended, complete answers.
Download PDFInterrogatories to Weng
Joey’s written questions concerning trial preparation, the DCP&P letter, transcript access, and related evidence.
Download PDFRequests for production to Weng
Joey’s requests for documents supporting Weng’s trial preparation, courtroom argument, and admissions responses.
Download PDFThe DCP&P letter contains a confidentiality warning. This site therefore provides only a copy with personal identifiers permanently removed and places it beside Weng’s exact words from the court record.
DCP&P determination and municipal-court transcript
Read the redacted determinationThe police call—and the report Joey wanted
After Hillside School shared Joey’s emails and voicemail with Officer David Sweely, the officer called Joey with a warning to stop communicating with the school and PTO. The police report expressly states that DCP&P had determined the underlying allegation was unfounded and that Joey had attached the determination letter. During the recorded call, Joey asked Sweely to investigate what Joey believed was a false report. Sweely answered: “No, I am not going to investigate that.”
Public copies: residential addresses, dates of birth, personal descriptors, personal email addresses, telephone numbers, and private mail-session links have been removed. The audio is complete and unedited except for conversion from WAV to a browser-friendly MP3 format.
The report versus the recordings
Police acted on the school’s concern—and refused Joey’s request
The school was entitled to report a message it found concerning. The complete record also shows what happened when Joey tried to report his side: Sweely acknowledged the unfounded determination, then declined to investigate the alleged false report.
Police knew the DCP&P result
“The NJ Division of Child Protection and Permanency … investigated the abuse claim and determined it was unfounded.”
Sweely’s narrative also says Joey attached the state’s written determination to his PTO email.
Joey asks for an investigation
Joey: “I just informed you of a crime, are you going to investigate it?”
Sweely: “No, I am not going to investigate that.”
No criminal complaint was filed
“No complaints filed. No further police action.”
The report says the two police calls, Joey’s voicemail, and the printed emails were all submitted as evidence.
What the emails actually show
Harsh accusations, a public meeting—and no express threat
- The principal forwarded Joey’s emails to the school resource officer on March 7, March 17, and March 31.
- Joey accused Olland of coaching the allegation, demanded her removal from the PTO, and used inflammatory language.
- The March 31 email says, “I will be at the next school board meeting,” and asks to attend a PTO meeting.
- The supplied email pages do not expressly threaten violence, threaten harm, or say Joey would go to Madden’s residence.
What Madden and Bourke said
Bourke wrote that she was “a little nervous” Joey might appear at an event. Sweely’s report says Madden was alarmed and concerned he might come to the school or her residence.
What Sweely would—and would not—say
Sweely called the voicemail vulgar and relayed the principal’s and superintendent’s concern. When Joey repeatedly asked whether Sweely personally considered it alarming, Sweely answered: “I am not giving you my opinion.”
A warning the file does not explain
The report says Sweely told Joey he could attend the usually open Board of Education meeting, but that accusations against staff or parents “would not be permitted during public comments.” The supplied file identifies no written policy or court order for that restriction.
Listen in sequence
The three original recordings
Hear the evidence before reading anyone’s interpretation.
Complete source set
Download every April 1 reference
The public report and email copies remove residential and personal contact information. The recordings are complete; the full and condensed PDFs contain the same certified Volume I transcript.
PDF
Mount Laurel Police full case report
The complete four-page report for Case 2022-10079, including Sweely’s narrative and the CAD logs.
Download PDFPDF
Emails supplied to police
All ten pages showing the March 4, March 17, and March 31 email chain forwarded from the PTO and school to Sweely.
Download PDFAudio
Joey’s voicemail to Hillside School
The complete 1-minute, 20-second voicemail that prompted the April 1 police contact.
Download AudioAudio
Sweely’s first call to Joey
The complete 10-minute, 20-second call transcribed in Volume I.
Download AudioAudio
Sweely’s follow-up call
The complete 3-minute, 42-second second call concerning the public school-board meeting.
Download AudioPDF
Full transcript of the first call
The 17-page certified Volume I transcript, including the 14-page call and word index.
Download PDFPDF
Condensed transcript
The same certified Volume I transcript in a seven-page condensed layout.
Download PDFThe certified Volume I transcript covers Sweely’s first call. The follow-up call and school voicemail are supplied as complete audio recordings. Audio was converted from WAV to MP3 for browser playback; no words were cut or rearranged.
Police report, school emails, original audio, and certified transcript
Read the certified transcriptCivil service becomes a police complaint
Months later, an attempt to accomplish service in an active civil lawsuit leads to a Mount Laurel harassment complaint. Emails, court filings and body-camera recordings preserve what the police knew and when they knew it.
Emails, court filings and body-camera video
Watch the body-camera excerptWhat was said under oath
The municipal-court testimony is compared with the dated emails and recordings. The evidence will be shown side by side so readers can evaluate the differences themselves.
Trial transcript and contemporaneous emails
See the evidence comparisonImportant notice
Justice for Joey presents Joseph Fabozzi’s account of disputed events and ongoing legal matters. Some statements concern allegations that are denied or contested. Materials are presented for public understanding and should be evaluated in their full context.
This site does not ask anyone to contact, confront or harass any defendant, witness, attorney, judge, court employee, police officer or public employee. Private information will be redacted before publication.